![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comparative Constitutional Law- Master Course, Law Faculty University of Belgrade, October 31 – November 17th, 2011
Program:
Workshop 1: Brewer Scalia Question: Introduction of Art. 39 of the South African Constitution Question would you and why introduce into your constitution such provision with what arguments pro and con? Documentation:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1352357/posts
Workshop 2: Marbury v. Madison Question: What are the main arguments to establish constitutional review? Could a continental court get to the same conclusions? Documentation: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=5&invol=137
Workshop: 3 Question: In what sense the Treaty of Lisbon improves principles of democratic governance? E.g. Human rights, democracy Look at the question in the light of the arguments of the German Constitutional Court Documentation: Treaty of Lisbon Workshops (PW)Workshop 1:The Values and Challenges of Comparative Legal Reasoning Brewer vs. Scalia Debate 0n the Introduction of Art 39 of the South African Constitution: Question: Given the provision in Article 142, para 2 of the Constitution of Serbia would you or would you not in addition introduce the solution provided in Article 39 of the SA Constitution? Please give pro and contra arguments. Documentation: Debate Scalia v. Breyer here Workshop 2::Marbury v. Madison - the First Case of Judicial Constitutional Review Question: What are the main arguments for introducing judicial constitutional review? Could a supreme court in a continental/civil law country reach the same conclusions? Documentation: Marbury v. Madison here Workshop 3:The Treaty of Lisbon and Democratic Governance here Question: In what sense does the Treaty of Lisbon further develop the principles of democratic governance? Please look at the question in the light of the arguments of the German Constitutional Court on Lisbon Treaty. Documentation: Lisbon Treaty and the Decision of the German Constitutional Court Workshop 4:Evaluation of the Governmental System in the Serbian Constitution of 2006 Question: How do you evaluate the governmental system in Serbia with respect to the discussed criteria for comparing and evaluating different governmental systems? Should the system in Serbia be changed, or should criteria be changed? Please provide the arguments for either position. Documentation: Constitution of Serbia (English translation) here The Opinion of the Venice Commission on the 2006 Constitution of Serbia – the Part on Human and Minority Rights Documentation: Opinion on the Constitution of Serbia: here |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||